One of the thing’s I’ve often been perplexed by is the Canadian need for immigration, it’s like no one ever read a book to see if population increases or decreases in the past were good for “we the people”. If you think it’s a good thing that it may cost a million bucks for a house in Toronto that doesn’t even have a parking spot while the average wage in Canada is 31k/yr [marginally higher than that in Toronto,] read no further.
This has nothing to do with immigration even though it has everything to do with immigration, so if you want to bash immigrants this isn’t the place well unless you count the Irish, is Riel about? But if a population increase hurts the peasantry is it something a democracy should aim for?
I picked Britain because the book is well detailed as many UK records are on file going back to the doomsday book 1000 yrs ago. There’s also a continuity, oh and it’s a book I happen to own, I bought it in Windsor castle.
I go through ups and downs of the population and how when pop bursts up times are tight and when it goes down times are good. Well the encyclopedia does I just quote. Now if a bursting population is bad why do we want it you may ask? When I was born in the 60’s our population was well under 20 million.
I went through the Oxford history of Britain from the black plague until kind of close to the present. One of the untold stories about the plague is that after it when the population dropped, 
Note back 500+ years ago they were paying women more than men because of a scarcity of labour! Feminists should want to stop all immigration tomorrow. Do the rich know this? I think they do. Immigraton might not be good for we the people but it is good for they the champagne clinkers. And like Paul Martins upcomming book book sez
Now who wants immigration the party of the rich, sweet. You may accept the pat on the head and accept that a bursting population is good but is it really? Would you rather live in a stone house or one made of straw like they want?
Course those entitled to their entitlements want an ever growing tax base for themselves.
But why would we want to be better off if immigration creates wealth why is Toronto 7 % unemployed? Canada 6.1% Winnipeg 4.2.

Imagine the King being worried the servants wanted excessive wages. Imagine how happy it made the servants. Now imagine immigration for the express purpose of ruining it for the peasants but you hate them right? Well someone hates the peasants.

Rising population inflation and unemployment, imagine all that at the same time. Kind of the opposite of when the pop is falling and they have deflation and can pick and choose employment. But it’s a good opposite ask anyone who supports immigration.

Real wages dropped by 57% woo hoo, more airplanes with newcommers needed. Vote Dion!!!

Population increased living standards dropped, population declined and the opposite. Thats not what the CBC says.


Growing population and underemployment do you see a trend? Luckily I do not.

Thus a growing population blah blah blah. I like how in Aldenham and Hertfordshire, they needed welfare for some reason I’m wondering if a family has on welfare for hundreds of years.

Static pop low food prices vs rapid population growth and I’m wondering will anyone read this? No wait Rapid population growth and low wages. Well it’s a good thing if you are a rich liberal and Paul; martin admits in his book its the real rich who support the liberals.

Wealth, then the Irish showed up, say no more, must have been something to do with the beer.

I’m done now. You get the point, or you don’t think in a so called democracy that I’m allowed charter right 2 which Steacy admits is an American concept. That’s why George Washington put it in Trudeau’s Charter of rights.
Any way if you were wondering why we have immigration well,… the people who want to pay lower wages and collect higher rents have an answer.
We don’t need immigration people try to guilt you into it. But we really don’t, in fact it’s bad for “we the people”, the people all our leaders claim to be in touch with. So in touch they’ve never bothered to track in the past whether population increases were good or bad! They just say it’s good and assume we will not know. In a democracy you are not supposed to have blood on the street to stop these things, Jack Layton claims to care for the little guy but he really doesn’t. Do you Jack?
Now a few decades ago when the economy had stagflation this surprised economists, [so my texts said] well I contend inflation is in part based on how many people you have if you double the population you need more food, shoes etc. Thus it need not be part of an over heating economy. Just one where the demand side
Also to add a Canadian angle when we had the highest population of immigrants was just before the great depression started in 1929.
Cheers,
M.A.D.