Sat 5 Jul 2008
Alleviate world hunger: produce more clean carbon dioxide
4 07 2008 From:Canada Free Press
By Dirck T. Hartmann Thursday, July 3, 2008
(Editor’s Note: To many in the know, Dirck T. Hartmann, who worked on the Apollo Space Program and many other significant NASA projects, was a fighter pilot in WWII, flying P38s. So when this gifted scientist/engineer/physicist and 87-year-old hero felt compelled to answer the questions of Man Made Global Warming, not only his son and grandchildren knew he had something to say with factual substance, truth and knowledge. What he has to say is clear and concise and should be read by everyone.)
What is your carbon footprint? That is the wrong question to ask. A more meaningful question is–How much carbon dioxide does it take to grow the wheat required to produce a loaf of bread? Or–How much carbon dioxide does it take to grow the corn for the chicken feed required to produce a dozen eggs?
Far from being a pollutant, man along with every animal on land, fish in the sea, and bird in the air is totally dependent on atmospheric carbon dioxide for his food supply.
Some politicians complain that the United States with only 3% of the world population uses 25% of the energy. But the clean carbon dioxide which we produce is increasing food production everywhere on earth. China, on the other hand, is building new power plants at a record rate using the abundant domestic supply of coal they have and has now passed the United States as the leading producer of carbon dioxide. Although their coal has a high sulfur content, they are building the new plants without any pollution controls. The sulfur dioxide which these power plants are releasing to the atmosphere, besides smelling like rotten eggs is, in sunlight, readily converted to sulfur trioxide, the highly solublegas responsible for most acid rain.
3 Responses to “Are you starving the world by producing too little CO2?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.



Stumble it!
-----
![Validate my RSS feed [Valid RSS]](http://marginalizedactiondinosaur.net/wordp/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/valid-rss.png)

July 6th, 2008 at 1:05 am
and now you show you ignorance of plant biology, and agricultural ecology.
Sufice to say that the relationship between CO2 and plant productivity isn’t as clear cut as you make it seem, and can infact retard plant growth in some situations, without saying anything about the effects of climate change.
July 7th, 2008 at 3:45 am
Hence why greenhouses buy it CO2,….
In “some situations” there’s that real science I hear about. when the atmosphere is 80% co2 and the following reaction cannot take place.
Photosynthesis doesn’t look clear cut! Says who?
6H2O + 6CO2 ———-> C6H12O6+ 6O2
July 7th, 2008 at 1:07 pm
says the man who realizes that that is a very simplified version, and doesn’t even take into account c3 c4 and cam plants.
Not only are you ignorant on this issue you resist any attempts to learn anything.