Sat 13 Sep 2008
Does homosexuals marrying effect your marriage? If you can’t call your wife, your wife….
Posted by dinosaur under homosexualsTRUST YOUR BETTERS! Social Engineers Know Best! “But They Said It Wouldn’t Affect Our Marriagesâ€, Never trust a revolutionary: they want a revolt, not the current status quo, and will say and do anything to get what they want
We’ve heard that often during the marriage debate. Every time we spoke out against redefining marriage, there was always someone on the anti-marriage side suggesting that we shouldn’t really care because recognizing perverse relationships as marriages wouldn’t affect our marriages in any way. Then, once the issue had been “settled” (e.g. once bill C-38 had been forced through the Commons and the Senate), the Ontario Liberal government had officially abolished such politically incorrect terms as “wife” and “husband”, “bride” and “groom”, replacing them with gender-neutral “spouses” or “partners”…
Same thing now happens in California. Couples that are biologically incapable of forming marital relationships are now being recognized as officially “married”. At the same time, the state no longer recognizes traditional couples as brides and grooms or as wives and husbands. They are now “party A” and “party B”.
2 Responses to “Does homosexuals marrying effect your marriage? If you can’t call your wife, your wife….”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Stumble it!
-----
![[Valid RSS]](http://marginalizedactiondinosaur.net/wordp/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed")
September 14th, 2008 at 4:28 pm
Californians will be soon protesting further. They will need a Party “C”, a Party “D” ad infinitum. A multi Gay grouping could be called a sexual monastery or a multi Lesbian arrangement a sexual convent (wouldn’t that get some attention). Coven may be more appropriate. A bisexual group could be called a sexual commune.
I think the government ought to get out of the marriage business. If certain religious communities wish to sanctify a union in their own way then it is upt to them and no outsiders business what their defined rules are.
The government of the day may wish to set out rules for cohabitors for taxation and benefits but that is it.
September 15th, 2008 at 4:01 am
Well it can get complex if I can have 3 wives and they each want 2 husbands and if someone dies who gets the life insurance.
And what if like you say one of the husbands is in a commune with 10 other guys, who gets custody of the children when the weekly divorce comes up.