Tue 6 Jan 2009
Canadian State Censors, John Chamberlin, Natalie Dagenais, Philippe Dufresne, Kathleen Fawcett, Harvey Goldberg, Fiona Keith, Sandy Kozak, Catherine Labelle, Vera Pantalone, Marie-Anne St-Amour, Dean Steacy, Richard Tardif and Marie Wankam.
Posted by dinosaur under Christianity , Free SpeechRe the post below, Ezra Levant is right. By dispatching the Lynch Mob to harrass Free Dominion for three years, the Chief Commissar of the Canadian “Human Rights” Commission is in explicit breach of the law as spelled out by the Supreme Court of Canada. In essence, her fantasy Jade Warriors are serving as the paramilitary wing of the ideological left. Nothing in the Taylor decision empowers them to act in this way. Indeed, it explicitly enjoins them not to so act. This is a flagrant abuse of power by the CHRC and as the person with executive responsibility Jennifer Lynch, QC should resign - or be fired.Ezra Levant thought the honor roll of the Canadian State Censorship Directorate was worth printing in full:
1.    John Chamberlin
2.    Natalie Dagenais
3.    Philippe Dufresne
4.    Kathleen Fawcett
5.    Harvey Goldberg
6.    Fiona Keith
7.    Sandy Kozak
8.    Catherine Labelle
9.    Vera Pantalone
10. Marie-Anne St-Amour
11. Dean Steacy
12. Richard Tardif
13. Marie Wankam
http://www.steynonline.com/content/blogsection/14/128/
Still what do we want when Steacy thinks section 2 of the Charter of Rights doesn’t exist for conservatives. You have the right to say anything socialists agree with. Think you get religious freedom? Tell that to Rev. Boissoin.
Trudeaupia! And it needs to be utterly destroyed.
But what do you want from an organization that fines companies for hiring too many white males then unilaterally declares they don’t have a bias against us.
3 Responses to “Canadian State Censors, John Chamberlin, Natalie Dagenais, Philippe Dufresne, Kathleen Fawcett, Harvey Goldberg, Fiona Keith, Sandy Kozak, Catherine Labelle, Vera Pantalone, Marie-Anne St-Amour, Dean Steacy, Richard Tardif and Marie Wankam.”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.



Stumble it!
-----
![Validate my RSS feed [Valid RSS]](http://marginalizedactiondinosaur.net/wordp/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/valid-rss.png)

January 8th, 2009 at 4:31 am
At the risk of being provocative, I would point out that the names above can easily be searched and their federal government e-mail addresses readily found. imagine the delight of the persons on that list were they to receive hundreds - nay! THOUSANDS! - of e-mails every day expressing disgust at what they do for their “pay”. I believe we have a word in English for people who do disgusting things for pay, don’t we? Given that, saying “Jennifer Lynch is an ugly old whore” would therefore be a statement of circumstantial fact, would it not? I mean, I think she’s Ugly (and from the inside out! That’s the kind of ugly that even cosmetic beauty can’t hide!). And Ms. Lynch’s ideas are certainly as old as Karl Marx, aren’t they? And doesn’t Ms. Lynch fuck Canadians for pay? Last time I checked, she does!
So, Canada, join me in singing this little ditty written to celebrate this newly established CANADIAN FACT.
JENNIFER LYNCH IS AN UGLY OLD WHORE,
SHE’S AN UGLY OLD WHORE,
YEAH, AN UGLY OLD WHORE.
JENNIFER LYNCH IS AN UGLY OLD WHORE,
LET’S FIRE LYNCH AND HER PALS NOW!
Sing out now!
JENNIFER LYNCH IS AN UGLY OLD WHORE,
SHE’S AN UGLY OLD WHORE,
YEAH, AN UGLY OLD WHORE.
JENNIFER LYNCH IS AN UGLY OLD WHORE,
LET’S FIRE LYNCH AND HER PALS NOW!
Be honest now! Didn’t that feel really GOOD?
January 8th, 2009 at 5:54 am
Are you trying to get me into trouble?
Hey wheres the emails.
January 8th, 2009 at 6:12 am
Since when did expressing FACT pose a thrat to anyone, Dinosaur? Opps! My bad! We’re in CANA-DUH - the Great White Waste of Time where “freedom’s just another word” that can be struck from the dictionary. I forgot! ;-(
But, that having been said, isn’t Jennifer Lynch an ugly old whore?